User Tools

Site Tools


polybrew:policies

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Next revision
Previous revision
polybrew:policies [2024/08/22 12:50] – created asiepolybrew:policies [2024/08/22 17:25] (current) asie
Line 10: Line 10:
  
   * Non-commercial ROMs created by hobbyists and distributed online free of charge are the most typical variant of homebrew, and are obviously in scope.   * Non-commercial ROMs created by hobbyists and distributed online free of charge are the most typical variant of homebrew, and are obviously in scope.
-  * Commercial releases distributed in specialist/hobby spaces, which do not masquerade as official cartridges, are in scope. However, without author permission,+  * Commercial releases distributed in specialist/hobby spaces, which do not masquerade as official cartridges, are in scope.
   * Software created for official hobbyist development kits is in scope provided that such a mode of distribution is distinct from official licensing. For example, Net Yaroze software is in scope, but GP2X software is out of scope.   * Software created for official hobbyist development kits is in scope provided that such a mode of distribution is distinct from official licensing. For example, Net Yaroze software is in scope, but GP2X software is out of scope.
 +  * Software created for microcomputers is generally not in scope - on such platforms, commercial and hobbyist developers were generally on equal footing, so it's much trickier to reason about scope.
   * ROM hacks, as not wholly original works, are not in scope. There are other, better spaces dedicated to indexing them. (However, original fan games are in scope.)   * ROM hacks, as not wholly original works, are not in scope. There are other, better spaces dedicated to indexing them. (However, original fan games are in scope.)
   * Tools which are homebrew, but serve the sole purpose of interacting with the world of licensed software - for example, save editors - are in a grey area.   * Tools which are homebrew, but serve the sole purpose of interacting with the world of licensed software - for example, save editors - are in a grey area.
Line 27: Line 28:
 While it is Polybrew's goal to document as many homebrew works as possible, it is not Polybrew's goal to make them available for download. While it is Polybrew's goal to document as many homebrew works as possible, it is not Polybrew's goal to make them available for download.
  
-In general, homebrew which is known to have been distributed //gratis// is likely to be available to download via Polybrew. However, official download sites are preferred. Conversely, commercial homebrew (currently being sold and/or never made available //gratis//) will not be made available to download via Polybrew, even if unauthorized download sources exist for such files.+If an official download source exists for a given homebrew program, it should always be linked first. 
 + 
 +Absent an official download location, homebrew which is known to have been distributed //gratis// and is not known to contain infringing material is likely to be available to download via links to platforms like the Internet Archive. 
 + 
 +Conversely, commercial homebrew (currently being sold and/or never made available //gratis//) will not be made available to download via Polybrew, even if unauthorized download sources exist for such files.
polybrew/policies.1724331042.txt.gz · Last modified: 2024/08/22 12:50 by asie